Panasonic G1 — first impressions

For quite some time now I’ve found myself frustrated with manually focusing adapted lenses on my Olympus E-P1. The low-resolving display simply isn’t accurate enough to focus without the magnification loupe. And even with the loupe activated, focusing can still be tricky. Then there is the issue of holding the camera still when you have it at arms length in front of you. So I was contemplating a number of options, chief among which ranked getting an E-P2, E-PL1 or E-P2 with the VF-2 external viewfinder. I would’ve known the interface, the menus, I would’ve gotten those great Olympus JPEG colors AND I would’ve had a high-resolving viewfinder that would a) allow more precise manual focusing and b) help stablising the camera. But since my budget was very tight, I couldn’t get either. (Thus, the new OM-D E-M5 was out of the question right from the beginning.)

Then I remembered that Panasonic’s Micro Four Thirds cameras have been using integrated hi-res EVFs from the very beginning, starting with the G1, the first Micro Four Thirds camera ever. So I did some research and found out that — despite lacking a video mode — the G1 still seemed to be a viable option, from a technical as well as financial point of view. A quick look at current eBay auctions conveyed that G1 bodies are being traded at insanely low prices these days, going as low as 100 € depending on their condition. None of the Olympus options would’ve been available for that low a price. And the main point for me was having an EVF with high resolution, which the G1 has. It might be considered “old” already  from a technological point of view — especially considering the brilliant EVF in the Sony NEX-7 –, but it resolves 1.44 million dots, which should in theory make manual focusing even without magnification a blaze.

So I took the plunge and got myself a black G1 in very good condition, looking like it had hardly been used. As soon as I received it, the first thing I tried was of course the EVF. While it is indeed not the best there is, it is absolutely sufficient for my needs. The image is created by sequentially displaying the red, green and blue channels at a high frequency that is not visible when your eye holds still. However, as you move your eye around, you can see colour artifacts that can be a bit distracting. But the resolution is very good, and high enough to even focus my 50mm f/1.4 SLR lens manually without magnification — although activating the magnification loupe, which needs two button clicks and a third for the higher magnification grade, helps significantly with achieving critical focus.

One thing that bugs me about the G1, though, is that when light gets sparse, the preview on the screen or the EVF is nowhere near what you will get in the final image. I am not used to this — the E-P1 will always preview exactly what I will get in the final JPEG image. With the G1, images taken in low light generally turn out a lot darker than the preview, while the display and/or EVF can get very noisy. This can be quite frustrating, but since I am shooting RAW (something that was recommended since Panasonic’s JPEG engine allegedly isn’t very good — something I have yet to confirm), I suppose I can always correct exposure in post-processing.

So far, I have only taken a couple of test shots, none which have any artistical value at all. But what I can say already is that I am quite satisfied with the EVF, and happy that I finally have a camera that enables me to manually focus my adapted lenses much easier and much quicker than was possible with the E-P1.

Another thing I found was that the G1 and the 20mm lens seem to be a perfect match — size-wise as well as technically. Since the lens was made for Panasonic’s cameras, the two work together very well. Focusing is much quicker than on my E-P1 (which was never famous for having a quick AF algorithm), and because of the size-adjustable focus point of the G1 also much more precise when it comes to critical focusing. Also, I really like the size, feel and handling of the package. BUT … the E-P1 + 20/1.7 is still smaller, and is still my favourite combo if I want to carry a small package that takes great JPEGs that don’t need much post-processing.

Stay tuned for future reports!

Hardware issues

It’s been quiet around here the last weeks, as regular visitors may have noticed. This is partly due to the fact that I am mostly busy with work and family, and rarely take the time to actively work in this site. I also started to post links to interesting news and articles to my facebook page almost exclusively, except for those which I find very important.

The other reason for the more recent silence is that my trusted Dell Latitude E5400 laptop, which I have been using both for work and private for the past two years, has suffered a failure of harddisk and battery almost simultaneously. I was lucky that I was able to salvage almost all of my important data before the disk broke down entirely.

2009 Dell Latitude E5400 | My trusty companion for two years.

Continue reading Hardware issues

TOP discuss the “Most Desirable Cameras on the Planet”

The Online Photographer has a new column which discusses the “Most Desirable Cameras on the Planet”. Counting down from 11 to 1, Mike Johnston presents and discusses eleven cameras that he deems desirable for different reasons.

Part 1 (the 11th-most desirable camera on the planate) was on the new PhaseOne IQ180 80-megapixel medium format digital back, whose image quality apparently challenges high-resolution scans of 8×10″ large format film.

Part 2, published yesterday, discusses the Nikon D3x, Nikon’s top-of-the-line, state-of-the-art, ultimate professional high-end full-frame “Hunka hunka burnin’ hunk” (TOP) DSLR.

If you’d like to read some moth-watering articles full of gearheadedness, make sure not to miss out this series.

What I hope for the NEX-7 to be.

I just joined the TalkNEX forum, a new forum dedicated to discussing the Sony NEX line of mirrorless cameras. My first post in that forum is about my hopes for the NEX-7, coming from the Leica M8, and some thoughts on rangefinder, analog and digital photography, and why I think that Leica failed at bringing the rangefinder idea into the digital age.

You can find it here: http://www.talknex.com/f12/m8-user-high-hopes-nex-7-a-263/

Now hear who’s crying again.

I just stumbled upon an article on 1001noisycameras, linking to high-ISO comparison by Focus Numérique, comparing the output of the new Sigma SD1 to that of the Nikon D7000. Of course, the Sigma SD1 looses big time in this pixel-peeping contest, and the editors and commentators on 1001nc go on to bash Sigma and rave about Nikon. Phrases such as “being horribly out of touch with the realities of the market” are uttered.

Now, I wonder who it is that’s “being horribly out of touch with the realities of the market” here. Sigma, or the people that compare a $6k, 15 megapixel Foveon sensored high-end specialty camera to a $1k prosumer model?

The reality of the market is that

  1. the Sigma SD1 and Nikon D7000 are aimed at two completely different groups of customers,
  2. the sensor technologies used in each camera are entirely different from each other and
  3. the noise reduction algorithms in the Sigma SD1 are thus far less destructive than those applied in the Nikon D7000, as the former is aimed at photographers looking for actual image quality, while the latter is aimed at “photographers” who believe image quality has to do with noise patterns.

One can argue whether the admittedly rather high price tag of the Sigma SD1 is “being horribly out of touch with the realities of the market”. Yes, I believe that’s actually up to debate, but I also believe Sigma are having their reasons for pricing the SD1 the way they did (development costs being one point). But the truth, uncomfortable as it may be for the noise kids out there, is that the SD1 delivers outstanding image quality if pixel-level sharpness and accurate colour reproduction is what you’re looking for. In that sense, the SD1 is indeed competing more with the medium format market than with the APS-C prosumer market.

Last but not least, here are a couple of links where you can learn a bit about the Sigma SD1 and the technology behind its Foveon sensor. This is some actual information, and not pixel-peepers’ pseudo-knowledge.

http://photorumors.com/2011/05/22/guest-post-detailed-analysis-of-the-sigma-sd1s-foveon-x3-technology/

http://www.x3magazine.com/2011/06/17/this-is-not-a-review-of-the-sigma-sd1/

http://www.rytterfalk.com/category/camera/sd1-camera/