<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>efix:photography - News. Thoughts. Pictures. &#187; e-pl1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/tag/e-pl1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography</link>
	<description>News from the world of photography. Thoughts on photographic topics. Pictures from my world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:44:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Building the perfect BUDGET Micro Four Thirds kit</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/10/07/building-the-perfect-budget-micro-four-thirds-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/10/07/building-the-perfect-budget-micro-four-thirds-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20/1.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-p1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro four thirds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=2912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Huff recently published an article titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/10/06/building-the-perfect-micro-43-camera-kit-for-under-2500/" target="_blank">Building the perfect Micro 4/3 Camera kit for under $2500</a>&#8220;, in which he talks about his favourite Micro Four Thirds cameras and lenses and where to get them. While his &#8220;perfect kit&#8221;, consisting of an <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/805176-REG/Olympus_V204031SU000_E_P3_PEN_Digital_Camera.html/BI/6742/KBID/7321/kw/OLEP31442S/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xOLEP31442S/" target="_blank">Olympus E-P3</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/805167-REG/Olympus_V311020SU000_M_Zuiko_Digital_ED.html/BI/6742/KBID/7321/kw/OL1220/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xOL1220/" target="_blank">Zuiko 12/2</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/651751-REG/Panasonic_H_H020_Lumix_20mm_f_1_7_Aspheric.html/BI/6742/KBID/7321/kw/PA2017/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xPA2017/" target="_blank">Panasonic Lumix 20/1.7</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/805165-REG/Olympus_V311030SU000_M_Zuiko_Digital_ED.html/BI/6742/KBID/7321/kw/OL4518/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xOL4518/" target="_blank">Zuiko 45/1.8</a> and the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/675005-REG/Olympus_260057_VF_2_Electronic_Viewfinder_Black_.html/BI/6742/KBID/7321/kw/OLVF2/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xOLVF2/" target="_blank">VF-2 viewfinder</a>, is certainly a killer combo, it also comes with a killer price tag &#8211; US-$ 2,697.85 if you buy from B&#38;H Photo.</p> <p>Not all of us have that much money to spend, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/10/07/building-the-perfect-budget-micro-four-thirds-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B&amp;H deals o&#8217; the day</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/01/19/bh-deals-o-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/01/19/bh-deals-o-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=2071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As you may know, I&#8217;m partaking in B&#38;H Photo&#8217;s affiliation programme in order to cover the cost for running this website. This site is a pure spare-time job of which I&#8217;m not making (and don&#8217;t intend to make) any money. However, I have to pay for running this site, and you can help me do so by using my links to B&#38;H whenever you plan to purchase something camera related, a product mentioned in one of my posts or anything from B&#38;H&#8217;s product range.</p> <p>Anyway, I just received an email from B&#38;H telling me about the latest deals, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2011/01/19/bh-deals-o-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photkina 2010: A report in pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/09/27/photkina-2010-a-report-in-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/09/27/photkina-2010-a-report-in-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20/1.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogon 35/2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c-mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-p1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lx5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro four thirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokton 25/0.95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokton 50/1.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photokina 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voigtländer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=1573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I previously announced, yesterday I spent the day visiting photokina 2010 in Cologne, and I brought back with me a huge load of impressions, pictures of latest models, of prototypes, and other stuff. So without much ado, here&#8217;s my report on the fair &#8212; by manufacturer, in alphabetic order.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Photokina 2010 south entrance</p> <p>General impressions from the fair will be posted in a seperate gallery soon.</p> <p>CAUTION! Massive amount of pictures ahead! Make sure your connection is fast enough, and that you have enough time! </p> <p>Canon</p> <p>The biggest players &#8212; Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/09/27/photkina-2010-a-report-in-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leica vs. MFT: Two reviews, one article</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/31/leica-vs-mft-two-reviews-one-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/31/leica-vs-mft-two-reviews-one-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 11:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are two new reviews and one article worth reading, all dealing with either MFT or Leica cameras, or both.</p> <p>First, Mike Zawadzki from Unique Photo has done an extensive <a href="http://uniquephoto.blogspot.com/2010/05/is-pen-mighter-than-slr.html" target="_blank">review of the Olympus E-PL1</a>, comparing it to two entry-level DLSRs and one advanced point-and-shoot. The result: the E-PL1 is the clear winner. Read his review to find out why.</p> <p>Then, DCWatch have published <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&#38;prev=_t&#38;hl=en&#38;zn=en&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;layout=1&#38;eotf=1&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fdocs%2Freview%2Fnewproduct%2F20100531_370187.html&#38;sl=ja&#38;tl=en" target="_blank">their take on the Leica X1</a>. As always, they have lots of nice pictures (worth taking a look at) paired with cryptic, Japanese-to-English Google translated comments.</p> <p>And finally, Steve Huff has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/31/leica-vs-mft-two-reviews-one-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-PL1 reviewed by dpreview</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/18/e-pl1-reviewed-by-dpreview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/18/e-pl1-reviewed-by-dpreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>dpreview have posted their (as always) long-awaited <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl1/" target="_blank">E-PL1 review</a>!</p> <p>The camera is out of question for me as its interface has been significantly dumbed down, but it is obvious that it outputs cleaner and sharper results than the E-P1 at any given ISO setting. As RAW noise is stronger than with the E-P1 (due to the lighter AA filter), the JPEG enginde must have been tweaked and seems to be doing a very good job! (In fact, dpreview didn&#8217;t manage to get better results with ACR!)</p> <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="E-PL1 reviewed by dpreview" data-url="http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/18/e-pl1-reviewed-by-dpreview/">Tweet</a> ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/05/18/e-pl1-reviewed-by-dpreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus PEN firmware update tested by dpreview</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/22/olympus-pen-firmware-update-tested-by-dpreview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/22/olympus-pen-firmware-update-tested-by-dpreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech-Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20/1.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-p1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kit zoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>dpreview have taken the time and tested the autofocusing performance of the E-PL1 with the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/1004/10041501olympusfirmware.asp" target="_blank">latest firmware update</a> for Olympus&#8217; PEN series. Their result: The E-PL1 with firmware 1.1 is on par with the Panasonic G1 when used with the M.Zuiko 14-42/3.5-5.6 kit zoom, and about 20% faster than the E-P2 with firmware 1.0. Paired with Panasoic&#8217;s kit zoom, the Lumix G 14-45/3.5-5.6, the E-PL1 focuses another 20% faster.</p> <p>You can read the full article <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/1004/10042202olypenfirmware.asp" target="_blank">here</a>.</p> <p>This gives hope that the E-P1 and E-P2 also perform considerably better with the new firmware. Also, this means [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/22/olympus-pen-firmware-update-tested-by-dpreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus promise better AF performance with upcoming PEN fw update</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/15/olympus-promise-better-af-performance-with-upcoming-pen-fw-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/15/olympus-promise-better-af-performance-with-upcoming-pen-fw-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-p1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-p2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.dcresource.com/news/newsitem.php?id=4115" target="_blank">dcresource.com</a>. Today, Olympus announced an upcoming firmware update for their three digital PEN cameras, the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_ep1.asp" target="_blank">E-P1</a>, <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_ep2.asp" target="_blank">E-P2</a> and <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_epl1.asp" target="_blank">E-PL1</a>. The update will improve autofocus speed with all MFT lenses, according to the press release, while dcresource speak of &#8220;about 15%&#8221;. The update will be released on April 22nd.</p> <p>Well, I guess that&#8217;s good news, isn&#8217;t it? I just happened to read a post in the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/" target="_blank">dpreview</a> <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1041&#38;/micro-four-thirds-talk-forum/" target="_blank">Micro Four Thirds Talk</a> forum mentioning that eventually Olympus will catch up with Panasonic in terms of AF speed. So [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/15/olympus-promise-better-af-performance-with-upcoming-pen-fw-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s review day! (Quick roundup)</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/07/its-review-day-quick-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/07/its-review-day-quick-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today seems to be review day. Nice!</p> <p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com" target="_blank">dpreview</a> have posted their long-awaited <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsungnx10/" target="_blank">review of the Samsung NX10</a>. <a href="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/" target="_blank">DCWatch</a> have posted their <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&#38;prev=_t&#38;zn=en&#38;hl=en&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;layout=1&#38;eotf=1&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fdocs%2Freview%2Fnewproduct%2F20100407_359457.html&#38;sl=ja&#38;tl=en" target="_blank">review of the Leica M9</a>. And finally, <a href="http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/" target="_blank">Steve Huff</a> has posted his <a href="http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/04/07/the-olympus-e-pl1-review-the-best-jpeg-camera-ever/" target="_blank">review of the Olympus E-PL1</a> (titled &#8220;The best JPEG camera EVER?&#8221;).</p> <p>Interestingly, Steve loves the E-PL1&#8242;s JPEG output so much he doesn&#8217;t even think of shooting RAW, and also he says he prefers the Olympus 17/2.8 over the Panasonic 20/1.7 on the E-PL1.</p> <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="It&#8217;s review day! (Quick roundup)" data-url="http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/07/its-review-day-quick-roundup/">Tweet</a> ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/04/07/its-review-day-quick-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A quick hands-on experience with the new Olympus E-PL1</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/25/a-quick-hands-on-experience-with-the-new-olympus-e-pl1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/25/a-quick-hands-on-experience-with-the-new-olympus-e-pl1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I took the time to slander* stroll through a local electronics store after work, and stumbled across the new <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_epl1.asp" target="_blank">E-PL1</a> in black which they had on display. I couldn&#8217;t resist but take it in my hands and fiddle around with it a bit </p> <p>So these are my first impressions, comparing it to <a href="http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/tag/e-p1/" target="_blank">my E-P1:</a></p> Although the shell is made from plastic and not from metal (as the E-P1&#8242;s), the E-PL1 feels very solid. The more pronounced grip makes it a bit easier to hold than the E-P1/2. The slightly smaller display is still [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/25/a-quick-hands-on-experience-with-the-new-olympus-e-pl1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Olympus E-PL1 reviewed by dcresource / previewed by Steve Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/24/olympus-e-pl1-reviewed-by-dcresource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/24/olympus-e-pl1-reviewed-by-dcresource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-pl1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dcresource.com/" target="_blank">dcresource</a> have posted their full review of Olympus&#8217; latest baby-MFT camera, the E-PL1. If you&#8217;re eager to learn how it handles, performs and compares to its bigger siblings, then you can read their review <a href="http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/olympus/e_pl1-review" target="_blank">here</a>.</p> <p>Interestingly they like the E-PL1&#8242;s image quality better than the E-P1/2&#8242;s, especially at high ISOs. If Olympus didn&#8217;t give the PL1 a new sensor, this can only mean they tweaked the JPEG engine. What I can say from sample shots I saw is that the E-PL1 seems to be heavier on noise reduction and sharpening to create more &#8216;consumer-friendly&#8217; output. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.efixmedia.de/photography/2010/03/24/olympus-e-pl1-reviewed-by-dcresource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

