M8 worries or Dawn of the Dead Pixels

I realized that a dead pixel on my M8’s sensor is causing a vertical line to be visible in high-ISO shots. It’s not visible below ISO 1250, though, so in good-to-mediocre light it’s not much of a problem. The dead pixels don’t bug me either, as they aren’t visible normally, but this line is, even in web-sized pictures. (The line is near the right-hand edge of the frame.)

M8, ISO 2500, 1/30 sec, JPEG from camera (resized)

100% crop from above

As you see, it’s only slightly visible, but it is annoying. I will get in contact with customer service in Solms, and I hope that this problem can be solved by mapping the dead pixels (as another L-Camera Forum user suggested), and that the sensor unit doesn’t need to be changed. (After all, the sensor is working perfectly apart from this.)

UPDATE: Another L-Camera Forum user suggested that I try the Pixel Fixer software, with which you can map hot pixels and ‘repair’ your RAW files. What can I say – I got rid of the problem! It even found two more hot pixels, and with specifying which pixels cause the vertical lines (I did indeed find another one at close inspection), I successfully removed the pixels as well as the lines from my DNGs. Great software! Depending on what answer I get from Leica Customer Service, I might continue fighting aberrant pixels with this software – it is probably much cheaper than having my M8’s sensor replaced.

UPDATE 2: Leica Customer Service replied to my inquiry, estimating they’d have to charge me approx. 120 € for mapping the faulty pixels. Whilst probably being much more affordable than having the sensor unit replaced, I think the most economical way to deal with this problem is to continue using Pixel Fixer unless more faulty pixels start appearing. Maybe in due time my M8 is going to need to be serviced anyway, who knows.

Picture of the day (May 31st, 2010)

This boules field is part of a recently redesigned area in the same local park near the humanities that has already been featured in some previous pictures. I haven’t yet observed anyone playing boules there.

"Empty boules field" | Leica M8 + Biogon 35/2 @ f/2, 1/180 sec, ISO 160

Processed from RAW in Lightroom 3 beta 2, then merged color and b&w version in Paint.NET. The slight yellow tint in the picture is due to the absence of a UV/IR cut filter in front of the lens*. I hope to receive one soon, though.


* FYI: The Leica M8’s sensor suffers from extended sensitivity to ultraviolet and infrared light, due to a very weak filter in front of the sensor. This can cause color ‘aberrations’ in the resulting pictures. To circumvent this problem, a UV/IR blocking filter is required to be mounted in front of every lens used with the M8.

Leica vs. MFT: Two reviews, one article

There are two new reviews and one article worth reading, all dealing with either MFT or Leica cameras, or both.

First, Mike Zawadzki from Unique Photo has done an extensive review of the Olympus E-PL1, comparing it to two entry-level DLSRs and one advanced point-and-shoot. The result: the E-PL1 is the clear winner. Read his review to find out why.

Then, DCWatch have published their take on the Leica X1. As always, they have lots of nice pictures (worth taking a look at) paired with cryptic, Japanese-to-English Google translated comments.

And finally, Steve Huff has written an article on his “two favorite Digital Cameras ever!” (mind the exclamation mark) – the Olympus E-PL1 and the Leica M9. An interesting essay on two simple and effective, yet substantially different photographic tools.


Buy the Olympus E-PL1 digital camera from B&H Photo Video Audio!
Buy the Leica X1 digital camera from B&H Photo Video Audio!
Buy the Leica M9 digital rangefinder camera from B&H Photo Video Audio!

Leica M8, the second take

This time with the Zeiss Biogon T* 2/35 ZM. I received the lens yesterday, and I’m verry happy with it. It has rich and warm color, great contrast, the famous Zeiss ‘3D pop’, smooth bokeh, smoothly operating focus and aperture rings – in summary, it’s pretty perfect. I’m glad I traded the Nokton 35/1.4 in for this!

Self portrait with Leica M8 + Biogon 35/2 @ f/2, 1/45 sec, ISO 160

I don’t think I’m going to miss the one extra stop of speed of the Nokton, as the Biogon is just so much nicer in every other respect. It is considerably longer (physically) than the Nokton (which is close to being a ‘pancake’), but it has no focus shift whatsoever and is tack sharp already at f/2, becoming even sharper from f/2.8 onwards. It’s also twice the money, but the price difference surely shows (and is surely worth it).

I’ll post some more significant pictures soon, when I’ve had the time to shoot the lens a bit more.

M.Zuiko 14-150/4-5.6 first samples

Via 43rumors.com. A Flickr user has posted some first sample shots taken with the announced Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-150mm f/4-5.6 lens, which is estimated to be released to the mass market by the end of june.

So if you’re interested in this lens and would like to evaluate its performance before buying it, you might want to consider taking a look at these shots.

P.S.: Even more pictures can be found in this translated japanese forum discussion.